Korean J. Remote Sens. 2023; 39(6): 1565-1576

Published online: December 31, 2023

https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2023.39.6.2.5

© Korean Society of Remote Sensing

천리안해양위성 2호(GOCI-II) 원격반사도 품질 검증 시스템 적용 및 결과

배수정 1)·이은경1)·Jianwei Wei2)·이경상3)·김민상4)·최종국5)·안재현 3)*

1) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 기술연구원(Researcher, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea) 2) NOAA STAR 박사과정생(PhD Student, Center for Satelite Applications and Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA) 3) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 선임연구원(Senior Researcher, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea) 4) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 UST학생연구원(UST Student, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea) 5) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 책임연구원(Principal Researcher, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea)

Application and Analysis of Ocean Remote-Sensing Reflectance Quality Assurance Algorithm for GOCI-II

배수정 1)·이은경1)·Jianwei Wei2)·이경상3)·김민상4)·최종국5)·안재현 3)*

Abstract

An atmospheric correction algorithm based on the radiative transfer model is required to obtain remote-sensing reflectance (Rrs) from the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager-II (GOCI-II) observed at the top-of-atmosphere. This Rrs derived from the atmospheric correction is utilized to estimate various marine environmental parameters such as chlorophyll-a concentration, total suspended materials concentration, and absorption of dissolved organic matter. Therefore, an atmospheric correction is a fundamental algorithm as it significantly impacts the reliability of all other color products. However, in clear waters, for example, atmospheric path radiance exceeds more than ten times higher than the waterleaving radiance in the blue wavelengths. This implies atmospheric correction is a highly error-sensitive process with a 1% error in estimating atmospheric radiance in the atmospheric correction process can cause more than 10% errors. Therefore, the quality assessment of Rrs after the atmospheric correction is essential for ensuring reliable ocean environment analysis using ocean color satellite data. In this study, a Quality Assurance (QA) algorithm based on in-situ Rrs data, which has been archived into a database using Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) Bio-optical Archive and Storage System (SeaBASS), was applied and modified to consider the different spectral characteristics of GOCI-II. This method is officially employed in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s ocean color satellite data processing system. It provides quality analysis scores for Rrs ranging from 0 to 1 and classifies the water types into 23 categories. When the QA algorithm is applied to the initial phase of GOCI-II data with less calibration, it shows the highest frequency at a relatively low score of 0.625. However, when the algorithm is applied to the improved GOCI-II atmospheric correction results with updated calibrations, it shows the highest frequency at a higher score of 0.875 compared to the previous results. The water types analysis using the QA algorithm indicated that parts of the East Sea, South Sea, and the Northwest Pacific Ocean are primarily characterized as relatively clear case-I waters, while the coastal areas of the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea are mainly classified as highly turbid case-II waters. We expect that the QA algorithm will support GOCI-II users in terms of not only statistically identifying Rrs resulted with significant errors but also more reliable calibration with quality assured data. The algorithm will be included in the level-2 flag data provided with GOCI-II atmospheric correction.

Keywords GOCI-II, Atmospheric correction, Quality assurance, Ocean color

Korean J. Remote Sens. 2023; 39(6): 1565-1576

Published online December 31, 2023 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2023.39.6.2.5

Copyright © Korean Society of Remote Sensing.

천리안해양위성 2호(GOCI-II) 원격반사도 품질 검증 시스템 적용 및 결과

배수정 1)·이은경1)·Jianwei Wei2)·이경상3)·김민상4)·최종국5)·안재현 3)*

1) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 기술연구원(Researcher, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea) 2) NOAA STAR 박사과정생(PhD Student, Center for Satelite Applications and Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, College Park, Maryland, USA) 3) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 선임연구원(Senior Researcher, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea) 4) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 UST학생연구원(UST Student, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea) 5) 한국해양과학기술원 해양위성센터 책임연구원(Principal Researcher, Korea Ocean Satellite Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology, Busan, Republic of Korea)

Application and Analysis of Ocean Remote-Sensing Reflectance Quality Assurance Algorithm for GOCI-II

배수정 1)·이은경1)·Jianwei Wei2)·이경상3)·김민상4)·최종국5)·안재현 3)*

Abstract

An atmospheric correction algorithm based on the radiative transfer model is required to obtain remote-sensing reflectance (Rrs) from the Geostationary Ocean Color Imager-II (GOCI-II) observed at the top-of-atmosphere. This Rrs derived from the atmospheric correction is utilized to estimate various marine environmental parameters such as chlorophyll-a concentration, total suspended materials concentration, and absorption of dissolved organic matter. Therefore, an atmospheric correction is a fundamental algorithm as it significantly impacts the reliability of all other color products. However, in clear waters, for example, atmospheric path radiance exceeds more than ten times higher than the waterleaving radiance in the blue wavelengths. This implies atmospheric correction is a highly error-sensitive process with a 1% error in estimating atmospheric radiance in the atmospheric correction process can cause more than 10% errors. Therefore, the quality assessment of Rrs after the atmospheric correction is essential for ensuring reliable ocean environment analysis using ocean color satellite data. In this study, a Quality Assurance (QA) algorithm based on in-situ Rrs data, which has been archived into a database using Sea-viewing Wide Field-of-view Sensor (SeaWiFS) Bio-optical Archive and Storage System (SeaBASS), was applied and modified to consider the different spectral characteristics of GOCI-II. This method is officially employed in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)’s ocean color satellite data processing system. It provides quality analysis scores for Rrs ranging from 0 to 1 and classifies the water types into 23 categories. When the QA algorithm is applied to the initial phase of GOCI-II data with less calibration, it shows the highest frequency at a relatively low score of 0.625. However, when the algorithm is applied to the improved GOCI-II atmospheric correction results with updated calibrations, it shows the highest frequency at a higher score of 0.875 compared to the previous results. The water types analysis using the QA algorithm indicated that parts of the East Sea, South Sea, and the Northwest Pacific Ocean are primarily characterized as relatively clear case-I waters, while the coastal areas of the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea are mainly classified as highly turbid case-II waters. We expect that the QA algorithm will support GOCI-II users in terms of not only statistically identifying Rrs resulted with significant errors but also more reliable calibration with quality assured data. The algorithm will be included in the level-2 flag data provided with GOCI-II atmospheric correction.

Keywords: GOCI-II, Atmospheric correction, Quality assurance, Ocean color

KSRS
December 2024 Vol. 40, No.6, pp. 1005-989

Metrics

Share

  • line

Related Articles

Korean Journal of Remote Sensing