Korean J. Remote Sens. 2024; 40(3): 243-255
Published online: June 30, 2024
https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2024.40.3.1
© Korean Society of Remote Sensing
Correspondence to : Jinha Jung
E-mail: jinha@purdue.edu
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This study compares Static Terrestrial Laser Scanning (STLS) with the conventional Total Station (TS) method for the geometric assessment of cylindrical storage tanks. With the crucial need for maintaining tank integrity in the oil and gas industry, STLS and TS methods are evaluated for their efficacy in assessing tank deformations. Using STLS and TS, the roundness and verticality of two cylindrical tanks were examined. A deformation analysis based on American Petroleum Institute (API) standards was then provided. Key objectives included comparing the two methods according to API standards, evaluating the workflow for STLS point cloud processing, and presenting the pros and cons of the STLS method for tank geometric assessment. The study found that STLS, with its detailed and high-resolution data acquisition, offers a substantial advantage in having a comprehensive structural assessment over TS. However, STLS requires more processing time and prior knowledge about the data to tune certain parameters and achieve accurate assessment. The project outcomes intend to enhance industry professionals’ understanding of applying STLS and TS to tank assessments, helping them choose the best method for their specific requirements.
Keywords Geometric tanks assessment, STLS, TS, API standards
Korean J. Remote Sens. 2024; 40(3): 243-255
Published online June 30, 2024 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2024.40.3.1
Copyright © Korean Society of Remote Sensing.
Mansour Alghamdi1, Jinha Jung2*
1Master Student, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2Associate Professor, Lyles School of Civil Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Correspondence to:Jinha Jung
E-mail: jinha@purdue.edu
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This study compares Static Terrestrial Laser Scanning (STLS) with the conventional Total Station (TS) method for the geometric assessment of cylindrical storage tanks. With the crucial need for maintaining tank integrity in the oil and gas industry, STLS and TS methods are evaluated for their efficacy in assessing tank deformations. Using STLS and TS, the roundness and verticality of two cylindrical tanks were examined. A deformation analysis based on American Petroleum Institute (API) standards was then provided. Key objectives included comparing the two methods according to API standards, evaluating the workflow for STLS point cloud processing, and presenting the pros and cons of the STLS method for tank geometric assessment. The study found that STLS, with its detailed and high-resolution data acquisition, offers a substantial advantage in having a comprehensive structural assessment over TS. However, STLS requires more processing time and prior knowledge about the data to tune certain parameters and achieve accurate assessment. The project outcomes intend to enhance industry professionals’ understanding of applying STLS and TS to tank assessments, helping them choose the best method for their specific requirements.
Keywords: Geometric tanks assessment, STLS, TS, API standards